Desert of the Heart by Jane Rule/Desert Hearts dir. Donna Deitch.

Desert of the Heart is a classic novel by Jane Rule which explores the lives of women in America in the 1960ss. Set against the backdrop of the Nevada Desert and exploring life in the 1950s when women’s lives were very much restricted, it explores the relationship between an English Professor and a young woman living on a ranch in Reno, and provides an explicit account of emergent lesbian love and its challenges. Rule evokes a vivid and detailed world in which the attraction between two women, as problematic as it is, signifies life, energy, and vitality.

The 1985 film inspired by the book, Desert Hearts, directed by Donna Deitch, is as transgressive and thought provoking as the book, but for different reasons. It is the first lesbian film of its type which presents both the angst of lesbian life and love and a potential happy ending, unlike its predecessors such as The Killing of Sister George and The Children’s Hour. It was also the very first lesbian film I ever saw.

I was 19 years old, at my first ever ‘grown-up’ lesbian party, in a house actually owned by a lesbian couple. Everything was new. I knew nothing of how gay people could live together, and had come to my awareness of my sexuality in my own ‘desert of the heart’ with no idea of what it meant to be attracted to my own sex. I remember the room was full of women, of various ages, styles and sizes, and I was on a date with a woman I had been attracted to for months. I settled down in front of the sofa, on the floor, to watch the film, which everyone else had seen many times, and it was only during the hotel room scene that I realised they were all watching me, and my reactions, rather than the film!

The film and book are radically different in many ways, and in particular, the relationship between Cay/Ann and the stepmother Frances differs strongly. However, the narratives resonate powerfully for me and for many people I have talked to because of the issue of the close relationship between a mother and her daughter/stepdaughter and the issues with that daughter developing a close bond with another woman. This raises some interesting questions about the nature of women’s intimate and close relationships and for this reason the book is very much on my recommended reading list for friends and the film remains one of my favourites. The book in particular speaks strongly to me of the tension between family and romantic love, and in particular, the loss that many LGBT+ people have faced, having to choose between their family and their identity, when family cannot accept their gender or sexuality. To lose the support and love of your birth family is tragic, but for many it is simply a fact of their life.

In the wider context of LGBT+ history, both the book and the film are products of their time, but still relevant now. Many women did not (and still do not) identify an attraction to women until later in their lives, often after marrying and having children. This may indeed be the same for people of all genders, and it makes me reflect on the ways in which we are ‘channelled’ towards certain expectations and choices in life. Our collective history certainly shows that regardless of the social, political and legal conditions in which our lives take place, we still fight for the freedom to live and love honestly and without oppression. This is more apparent than ever in today’s changing global and political landscape. The value of works such as these lies in their ability to ground us both in the past and in the reaffirmation of our commitment to a better future, for all.

February 8th, 2017

Posted In: Uncategorized

Tags: , ,

One Comment

As part of LGBT History month the library here at Swansea University have put together a reading list of books, DVDS and journals on LGBT related themes.
Most of these are available at Singleton Park library but students can always request that items are brought to the Bay Library or Miners’ Library. They have also written a blog post to advertise the list at: (English version) (Welsh version)

The reading list is here:

We here at the network are delighted to see the Library respond in this way to LGBT History Month.

And if that isn’t enough, there will be more discussions of LGBT+ fiction and films on this blog throughout the month.

February 7th, 2017

Posted In: Uncategorized

Leave a Comment

It has been an amazing weekend basking in the glory of our Award win, but here is the current line-up for our Symposium on 15 February (updated on 7 February).  It is going to be a great day, with lunch provided. You can still get tickets at

9.00 Registration
9.30 Welcome and Introduction to the Day: Kevin Child, Director of Student Services, Swansea University
9.40 Keynote Address: Dr Alys Einion, Associate Professor, Author and Co-Chair LGBT+ Staff Network. Pride and Prejudice: The Past, the Present, the Future?
Session 1: We’re Here, We’re Queer Chair: Dr Alys Einion
10.15 Cath Camps and Catherine Emmett New Wave Queerness and the Academy
10.35 Cath Elms:
10.55 Dr Catherine Fletcher: Same-Sex Marriage in Renaissance Rome
11.15 BREAK
Session 2: Talking Trans* Chair: Cath Elms
11.30 Jenny-Anne Bishop: 12 Years of Sparkling in Swansea and Manchester
11.50 Glenn Miles: Vulnerability and Resilience of Transgender women in Cambodia and Thailand
12.10 Eve Elizabeth Moriarty: Born Naked: Drag, Gender Fluidity, Feminism and Me.
12.30 Dr Michele Raithby: Investigating Dignified and Inclusive Health and Social Care for Older Trans* People in Wales: The TrAC Project
12.50 LUNCH
Session 3 Ups and Downs Chair: Eve Moriarty
13.30 Andrew Davies (Unity Centre): We All Fall Down
13.50 Mark Lilly Auntie Hate: BBC Homophobia and its Evolution
14.10 Kirsti Bohata: Amy Dillwyn
14.30 Edith England and Josie Henley: The internet as a tool to reduce LGBT health inequalities: a partnership approach
14.50 BREAK
Session 4 Making History Today Chair: Dr Alys Einion
15.10 Mitchell Jones (Calon): Role Models and Staff LGBT Networks
15.30 Neil Harris: Surveying the landscape: dystopos, eutopos and the LGBT+ language learning experience
15.50 Panel Discussion: Making History Today Dr Alys Einion (Chair), Cath Elms, Neil Harris, Jenny-Anne Bishop, Mark Lilly, Dr Michele Raithby.
16.20 Closing Address: Professor Hilary Lappin-Scott, Pro Vice-Chancellor, Swansea University
16.30 Close and Invitation to the Social (at Taliesin Arts Centre): Cath Elms and Alys Einion



Optional Film Screening at Taliesin Arts Centre (must be booked in advance) Visit

February 6th, 2017

Posted In: Uncategorized

Tags: ,

Leave a Comment


Well, this is a very easy blog post to write. Last night, I attended the Stonewall Cymru Workplace Equality Index Awards in Cardiff. It was a glittering event with many of the movers and shakers in equality in attendance. I was there with my co-chair of the Swansea University LGBT+ Staff Network, Cath Elms, and other members of the Equalities Team from Swansea University.

We were already aware that we had been awarded Highly Commended Staff Network of the Year at the National Stonewall Workplace Equality Index, which meant we could add a special banner to our emails. We had also learned we had climbed five more places in the Workplace Equality Index, which makes Swansea University one of the top employers in Wales for LGBT+ equality.

Imagine our surprise as the host announced we had won the Stonewalll Cymru staff network of the year award!

We hurried up to receive it, completely shocked, and Cath and I quickly agreed who would speak, as everyone was giving acceptance speeches, just like the Oscars. I can’t even remember what I said now, but I know I made sure to thank the Equalities Team and the Network, and to emphasise how much Cath and I do to lead the Network with, as yet, very few resources. I know I concluded with saying that this award means we can now do more.

That is how we feel about it. We are delighted to have won, and in particular, I am very glad to see my co-chair get some recognition of her work and input (and I feel happy to have that recognition too). We both put a lot of our own time and energy into this and we ask for nothing more than the feeling that we are making the world a better place. We don’t do this for the glory, we do it because it matters, but it is very nice indeed to win an award and once again put Swansea University firmly on the map as an inclusive employer and a great place to work and study.

I also feel very proud of our Network and all that we achieve together.

It was a lovely evening. We just kept smiling and grinning and congratulating each other, and other people came up to congratulate us, and it was a shining moment in what are very dark times politically. I smiled all the way home.

It is just starting to sink in what this means for us, the Network, the University, and our future goals. It is something that will help us to share our message, involve more network members and Allies, and to do more and more to push forward equality for all.

So, thank you Stonewall Cymru, you have made us very happy.

We can do more. We will do more. We will make this world a better place, one step at a time.


By Dr Alys Einion, co-chair of the Swansea University LGBT+ Staff Network


February 4th, 2017

Posted In: Uncategorized

Tags: , ,

Leave a Comment

Monsieur and Me: A Reflection on the Historical Novels of Sarah Waters

Many moons ago I worked voluntarily at an excellent (sadly now closed) lesbian lifestyle magazine called Velvet. I did marketing and PR, and one of my more beloved roles was to do book and film reviews. It was through this that I first became aware of the novelist, Sarah Waters, whose titles Tipping the Velvet, Fingersmith and Affinity have all been adapted for television or film. Tipping the Velvet, her first novel, blew my mind, because it was both a very well researched historical novel and a narrative that spoke powerfully and eloquently about the love between two women. The deep, all-encompassing and life-changing passion that Nan feels for Kitty echoed my own feelings, experiences and desires, and perhaps it was that familiarity which endeared it to so many other readers.

Historical fiction is a very popular genre and yet it was not one I usually read. But Waters had me hooked from almost the first line. Her detailed, seamless literary style combined with such a wealth of contextual, historical detail that it seemed to me that she brought the Victorian world to life. And for the first time, it made me think about the LGBT* people who lived and loved and worked, and struggled and starved, and succeeded, in some cases, at that time. It made it seem entirely normal, and reasonable, that there were women dressing as men and loving each other. That Waters published her book as a mainstream book, not as lesbian genre fiction, was another significant dimension of my reading experience and her ongoing success.

And then there was Monsieur. The novels I had read outside of the lesbian fiction genre did not deal with lesbian sex in any real way. It was alluded to, it was cleverly circumvented so that there was a sex-shaped hole in many stories (even those mainstream thrillers written by the wonderful Val McDermid), but it seemed that Sarah Waters transgressed the final taboo. Monsieur, made of leather, not only featured uncompromisingly in her book, but also in the Andrew Davies/BBC three part adaptation. Yet another aspect of lesbian identity and behaviour made manifest in the ‘normal’ world. How wonderful. How disturbing. How strange.

Although the subsequent novels take a darker turn, exploring more psychological, supernatural and psychic dimensions of the lives of women, and are less sexually explicit, there is an ongoing allusion to the nature of lesbian sexuality which, for the queer reader, evokes a sense of familiarity. Here at last are the books that speak to us on an intimate level. They whisper “you see, I know you!”

What struck me, and still does, when reading these three different, and so cleverly crafted books, is not only her representation of the times and culture in which they took place, but Waters’ willingness to explore the ambiguities of lesbian identity and sexuality alongside a tacit acknowledgement of the fact that women are not always very nice to each other. I had read other Victorian fiction and yet here was an insight from a different perspective. A woman’s perspective but not just any woman. These women were different. They challenged me. And I love to be challenged.

Researching further, I found a link to her PhD Thesis: Wolfskins and togas : lesbian and gay historical fictions, 1870 to the present. Reading this opened my eyes to the nature of queer fiction throughout history, more so than my rudimentary understanding of Sappho, Wilde, Hall and others. What she has done, in this thesis and in her published fiction, is to open up a window into historical life viewed differently from the ‘malestream’ disciplines of both history and fiction, whilst adhering brilliantly to the conventional forms of the novel (and of the thesis, I might add). To see an academic, and a novelist, creating a niche for her work and achieving wide acclaim (just check her Widipedia entry to see how many awards she has won) whilst celebrating the history of queer people is both reassuring and pleasurable. As a novelist myself, I am in awe of her skill and craft, and as an avid and avowed bibliophile, I can only hope she continues to thrill us with more books in the future.

As for monsieur… if you don’t already know, then read the book! I could never describe him in any way that would come close to Sarah Waters.

Check out her work at

By Dr Alys Einion,

Co-Chair, Swansea University Staff Network.

This blog series is coordinated by Dr Alys Einion of Swansea University and celebrates LGBT History Month 2017.



February 3rd, 2017

Posted In: Uncategorized

Tags: , ,

Leave a Comment

Reflections on Jane Austen, Intersectionality, and the Global Reader,

I’ve been passionately in love with Elizabeth Bennett for decades. As the primary character in Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice she seemed to epitomise so many things that I found admirable, including a good helping of disrespect for certain social norms and the ability to reply with a witty comeback when someone disrespects her. But as with all of Austen’s books, I also struggle with the deeply ingrained heterosexuality and gender normativity of her work. I forgive her, and the books, because they are products of their time, but I still struggle with only seeing snapshots of myself, and my queer peers, within these pages. Not that I don’t recognise some classic characters and find it easy to transpose them onto ‘lesbians I have known (and loved)’.  I have known quite a few Ms Darcys, whose arrogance at their position in life, manifested in their perfect adherence to ‘dyke’ haircuts and fashion make them walk into the room like a Shane thinking they own it and every woman there. I have known a few Ms Wickhams too, and, in my turn, been burned by them.

But I, like many of my generation, I suspect, still struggle with the strictures of heterosexual culture which are so powerfully reproduced in these books, even though Jane Austen gives a clear message about the wrongness of limiting a woman’s prospects by her fortune, connections and marriageability. About 10 years ago, I read Maria Edgworth’s Belinda for the first time, and found in this a much stronger cultural critique, particularly of the ways in which women are expected to behave. Edgeworth presents us with characters who not only challenge gender norms in behaviour, but in dress, and has women dressing as men and engaging in masculine pursuits including duels, riding, shooting and flirtations with other women. This made me realise that many women of that time period were indeed fighting against the dominant cultural tropes which relegated them to decorative additions to the salon, defined them by their dowries and their ‘accomplishments’ and basically chained them to the home once they were married and had started producing children. Not only was Mary Wollstencraft advocating for women’s autonomy, liberation and respect, but writers like Edgeworth were arguing that women had equality in every aspect of life. Belinda, her main character, evidences the intellectual capacity of a philosopher, a thinker, someone with high intelligence and insight, at a time when the dominant culture proposed that women’s brains were smaller and their limitation to the home sphere was for their own good, based on their physical and cognitive limitations.

Despite being madly in love with Elizabeth Bennett, and you know love is blind, I did, in my 20s and 30s, finally realise the limitations to these books that I know and love so well. They are products not only of their time but of a classist and ethnocentric system which totally overlooks and disenfranchises any woman not of a particular social class or racial background. Austen perhaps cannot be blamed for her limitations. But her representation of lower classes, of ‘gypsies’ and of anyone other than the families of ‘gentlemen’ is at best negligent. As my understanding not only of white privilege but of the vast complexity of our intersectional world, my love affair with Austen faded somewhat. I realised that the books and literature represented most in school, in University, and in adaptations for film and television repeated these biased tropes. Despite how much I love these stories, they have to be viewed as what they are, a very limited and restricted sample of life for a very small number of people at a particular point in time. Far from just failing to represent women, lesbians or gender in sufficient complexity, they fail to represent the bulk of social life.

What can we learn from this, for considering our LGBT history? Perhaps the main lesson is to develop our awareness, to deliberately step aside and consider things from different perspectives. To reach and to read outside our comfort zones. To look for literature that represents a variety of experiences and points of view. To deliberately challenge our own position and to search for and read things that go beyond our own perspectives. To engage in intersectionality in our reading, and in our consumption of films and television. To see ourselves as what we are, singular citizens of a tiny country (I speak from a UK perspective here) whose view on the world may be skewed by our lack of perspective and our lack of exposure. And to lobby for better recognition of the vast body of literature and art that represents the true diversity of the world. This year, finally, women (and men) of colour are finally being better represented in the vastly inflated world of the film industry, and works are emerging which set out to redress the balance in many ways. Over time, I have seen wider diversity in the books winning the huge literary prizes. But we should not be just looking at prizewinners. We should be looking beyond, to seek out representations of life, sexuality, gender, personhood, which show us as global citizens and to find, consume, and if necessary, produce, those books and stories which represent our past and our present so that others can learn too. If history has failed us, we can take back our history and make visible all that has been overlooked. We owe it to ourselves, and we owe it to each other.

By Dr Alys Einion,

Co-Chair, Swansea University Staff Network.

This blog series is coordinated by Dr Alys Einion of Swansea University and celebrates LGBT History Month 2017. To contribute, please email

February 2nd, 2017

Posted In: Uncategorized

Tags: , ,

Leave a Comment


Why our lives matter: Introducing LGBT History Month

You may ask yourself, why do LGBT+ people get to have their own month of celebrating their history? Why on earth are they making such a fuss? Well, to misquote a famous historian I saw on television just this week, it is because history has been told by the conquerors, and it is full of lies, half-truths and vast, vast omissions. LGBT+ people have largely been absent from the history books, relegated to the margins, dismissed or overlooked, or even deliberately erased from the pages of time, because we did not fit in with the dominant social and political norms and with the agendas of the historians. Just as women’s history has been overshadowed and disregarded by a largely heteropatriarchal society which afforded recognition only to the chosen few, in which knowledge was guarded by institutions such as the Church and the first Universities (remember, it wasn’t until the late 18th and early 20th Century that women were really accepted onto university courses, and it was some time until many were allowed to gain the degrees they had earned through their own merit – see ), so the history of LGBT+ people has been erased, hidden or overwritten, leaving us with slim pickings. Similarly, the literature, art and other works of LGBT people have been marginalised, or else their nature as LGBT+ people has been hidden. Just as famous women writers of the 19th Century were forced to submit their work under male pseudonyms to get published, queer artists, writers, scientists and activists have been either forced to hide their status or have had it stripped from them. The famous Ladies of Llangollen, for example, who both ran away from arranged marriages in Ireland to live in Wales together, still get described as companions and many sources vehemently deny that they were lovers. There are notorious exceptions, such as Oscar Wilde and Radclyffe Hall, but these remain the exception rather than the rule and can hardly be expected to represent the wide diversity of queer culture, expression and identity.

LGBT+ people and their work have been largely absent from the history books and from the education taught in schools and, sadly, in Universities. It has only been recently that such famous individuals as Alan Turing were celebrated instead of vilified. The fact that I am typing this blog on a computer, and you are reading it ‘online’ is partly because of him. When I studied literature, many moons ago, there were no queer writers included in the curricula I studied. Even in my own role, currently, sexuality, gender and queer studies is limited to a few brief sessions due to the demands of the curriculum, though I, like many other academics, am working to redress the balance.

We need our history to understand ourselves in context. We need to know who we are in relation to the lives of those who have come before us, who have helped to create a place in the world for us. The film Pride, dramatizing a key moment in British social history, reminds us that we were and are a part of life, of social activism, and that even while we were getting beaten and killed and ostracised, and being thrown out of our homes and disowned by our parents, we were still working to make the world a better place for ourselves and our communities. We were producing amazing works of literature and art, breaking new ground in science and knowledge, and transgressing every social law in order to create a world in which we could breathe freely.

Why does it matter? Because we are a part of history. History is being made, right now. And we can learn from history. We can be inspired, we can be warned, we can be strengthened. We can find ourselves, see ourselves reflected in those who came before us. We can build a world in which inclusion is the norm. We can own our history, and, where necessary, stand up and say Never Again. As one of the placards on the recent Women’s Marches and political protests marches reads, “History is Watching.” So I ask you – how do you want to be remembered? How will you go down in history?


By Dr Alys Einion,

Co-Chair, Swansea University Staff Network.

This blog series is coordinated by Dr Alys Einion of Swansea University and celebrates LGBT History Month 2017. To contribute, please email




February 1st, 2017

Posted In: Uncategorized

Leave a Comment

As part of Holocaust Memorial Day, this blog post is a reflection on the impact of genocide on the lives of individuals. Right now, people are being killed, and entire communities destroyed, in many places in the world. And even after all these years, we still haven’t eradicated genocide in our global consciousness or addressed the impact on individuals, society and the world.

The Holocaust Memorial Day Trust states: “Holocaust Memorial Day takes place on 27 January each year. It’s a time for everyone to pause to remember the millions of people who have been murdered or whose lives have been changed beyond recognition during the HolocaustNazi Persecution and in subsequent genocides in Cambodia, Rwanda, Bosnia and Darfur. On HMD we can honour the survivors of these regimes and challenge ourselves to use the lessons of their experience to inform our lives today. 27 January marks the liberation of Auschwitz-Birkenau, the largest Nazi death camp.

HMD is a time when we seek to learn the lessons of the past and to recognise that genocide does not just take place on its own, it’s a steady process which can begin if discrimination, racism and hatred are not checked and prevented. We’re fortunate here in the UK; we are not at risk of genocide. However, discrimination has not ended, nor has the use of the language of hatred or exclusion. There is still much to do to create a safer future and HMD is an opportunity to start this process.”

So why write about Anne Frank? Everyone knows her story. And yet many see it as just that, a sad, poignant story but one about a past we never thought would come again. That is our Western-Centric and limited view of such events. Anne Frank’s work is more important now, after 73 years, than ever, because it brings alive the experience of one person who was persecuted and, yes, killed, as a result of wholesale prejudice, political tyranny and social tolerance of violence and marginalisation. Social tolerance. People just like us who allowed this to happen.

One diary. One little book covering a period of around two years. Yet it is one of the most famous books in the world. Anne didn’t know, when she wrote it, that it would make her the writer she dreamed of being.

We all have dreams, goals, desires and visions for the life we would like to live. Hers are enshrined in this diary, and signify the life she never got to live. There are thousands, or even millions, who suffered in similar ways, who continue to suffer, whose lives are cut short, whose voices were never heard. Voices silenced forever. Stories forever untold. We grieve at all the potential Anne Frank displayed in her youthful diary, and wonder at the life she might have lived. She is the symbol of all those who never get the chance to live the life they should have had.

So it is incumbent upon us, those of us who are privileged to live with greater freedoms than she had, to stand up and argue for the eradication of genocide from the face of this planet.

We must stand up against tyranny, in all its forms, and against prejudice. Stand against sexism, racism, classism, ageism, homophobia, transphobia. Stand against religious prejudice, intolerance and discrimination. Stand against ANY individual or group which seeks to limit those freedoms we have fought so hard for. We can agree to disagree and still support each other to enjoy our own freedoms.

Many of us have led comfortable lives because others stood up for our rights. Many of us have been activists driving forward equality agendas. We have won many battles, built many strong foundations, but we cannot lay down our tools just yet. The world is changing, always, consciousness growing and shrinking simultaneously, and we face new emergent threats from many sources. It starts with us, as individuals, and grows as we grow together into a unified front that will NOT tolerate hate in any form.

On this Holocaust memorial day, write a diary entry, or a blog post, or a note, or a tweet, or a Facebook post, about who you are and the freedoms you believe in. Share your story. Inspire others. As Anne Frank shows, just one story can change the world. Imagine what thousands could do?


– See more at:

January 27th, 2017

Posted In: Uncategorized

Tags: ,




Tickets available from:

Pride and Prejudice: A Symposium of LGBT*+ History, Literature and Politics

Symposium Announcement and Call for Papers.


In honour of LGBT History Month, the LGBT+ Staff Network at Swansea University present a Symposium focusing on the historical representation of LGBT+ people in history, literature, the media and politics. Cath Elms and Dr Alys Einion, Network Co-Chairs, invite you to attend and to present your work or discuss your area of interest.

The event will be held at Swansea University on the 15 February 2017, and will include keynote speakers from the LGBT+ community, researchers, academics, authors and individuals combining to provide an insight into the varied and valuable history of LGBT+ people. The event will also include a panel discussion on the importance of recognising and celebrating LGBT+ history.

Submissions are welcomed for papers (20 minutes in duration) and posters relating to any aspect of LGBT*+ history and culture, and will aim to explore and celebrate the diversity and impact of people, events, publications, art, activites etc. We are looking to both interrogate and celebrate our history and our presence in the world. We particularly welcome papers which address intersectionality and multiple dimensions of identity and experience.


We welcome papers from non-academics and presentations from personal experience are particularly welcomed. Help us to raise awareness of the lives and experiences of LGBT+ people

Please send a 300 word abstract along with a 50 word biography, in the first instance, to, by 16 December 2016.

Please save the date in your diary!

Balchder a Rhagfarn: Symposiwm ar Hanes, Llenyddiaeth a Gwleidyddiaeth LGBT*+

Cyhoeddi’r Symposiwm a Galw am Bapurau.

I goffau Fis Hanes LGBT, cyflwynir Symposiwm gan y Rhwydwaith Staff LGBT+ ym Mhrifysgol Abertawe sy’n canolbwyntio ar gynrychiolaeth hanesyddol pobl LGBT+ yn hanes, llenyddiaeth, y cyfryngau a gwleidyddiaeth. Mae Cath Elms a Dr Alys Einion, Cyd-gadeiryddion y Rhwydwaith, yn eich gwahodd i fynychu ac i gyflwyno eich gwaith neu i drafod eich maes diddordeb.

Cynhelir y digwyddiad ym Mhrifysgol Abertawe ar 15 Chwefror 2017 a bydd yn cynnwys prif siaradwyr o’r gymuned LGBT+, gan gyfuno ymchwilwyr, academyddion, awduron ac unigolion i roi mewnwelediad i hanes amrywiol a gwerthfawr pobl LGBT+. Bydd y digwyddiad hefyd yn cynnwys trafodaeth panel ar y pwysigrwydd o adnabod a dathlu hanes LGBT+.

Croesawir cyflwyno papurau (20 munud o hyd) a phosteri sy’n ymwneud ag unrhyw elfen o hanes a diwylliant LGBT*+ a’r nod fydd archwilio a dathlu amrywiaeth ac effaith pobl, digwyddiadau, cyhoeddiadau, celf, gweithgareddau ayyb. Rydym yn bwriadu cwestiynu a dathlu ein hanes a’n presenoldeb yn y byd. Yn bennaf, byddwn yn croesawu papurau sy’n archwilio croestoriadau a dimensiynau lluosog o hunaniaeth a phrofiad.


Anfonwch grynodeb 300 o eiriau ynghyd â chofiant 50 o eiriau, yn yr achos cyntaf, i, erbyn 16 Rhagfyr 2016.

Nodwch y dyddiad yn eich dyddiaduron!


December 6th, 2016

Posted In: Uncategorized

Leave a Comment

wad-header-logo                                                                                              hiv_stigma_wrong


2016 is the year when we focus on ending the stigma associated with HIV infection. Most people infected with HIV who are treated do not develop AIDS, and the disease is now well controlled with the latest generations of drugs.
HOWEVER there are still lessons to learn about HIV/AIDS, and the biggest one is prevention.
Educate yourself about HIV and AIDS and the risks.
According to the Terrence Higgins Trust:
“Around 103,700 people were living with HIV in the UK at the end of 2014.
Of these 103,700, over 17,629 (one in six) don’t know they have HIV because they have never had an HIV test or they got HIV since their last test.
Recent years have seen around 6,000 people test positive for HIV each year – more than half are gay and bisexual men.
Around 44,980 gay and bisexual men and around 54,000 heterosexuals were estimated to be living with HIV in the UK by the end of 2014.
In the heterosexual population of those living with HIV, 55% are from black African communities but 45% are not, with over 24,000 from other communities.
The fastest growing group of people living with HIV are those aged 55 and over, with one in six people now accessing care for the condition.
London has the largest numbers of people living with HIV but numbers are growing in every part of the UK.”

Which groups are most affected by HIV? (
• HIV is largely linked to sexual behaviour: high numbers of sexual partners and anal sex without a condom carry a higher risk than unprotected vaginal sex (which is one of the reasons why gay and bisexual men have high rates of HIV).
• People who have moved here from parts of the world where HIV is much more common are another affected group.
• HIV infection is also linked to injecting drug use – drug users who share injecting equipment are at a greater risk (which is the reason for high rates of infection in some countries).

HIV infection can be prevented, but it can also be lived with. We live in an inclusive society but in which people suffer prejudice and discrimination for all kinds of reasons. HIV infection has been a source of stigma for more than thirty years, and it’s time to stop this. It’s time to put the fear behind us and get on with creating a better society, better communities focus on mutual respect and sharing. This World Aids Day, remember: STOP the STIGMA: SPREAD the LOVE.


November 29th, 2016

Posted In: Uncategorized

Leave a Comment

« Previous PageNext Page »

© Swansea University

Hosted by Information Services and Systems, Swansea University